File formats

What is an OST File And Why It Cannot Simply Be Copied

The file copies perfectly. Outlook on the other machine is what refuses it, over one record written inside the file.

11 min read

An OST is a cache rather than a copy. It exists so Outlook stays usable when the network is not, it holds whatever the sync settings decided was worth keeping locally, then carries a record of which mailbox it belongs to. That last detail is the whole reason moving one to another machine achieves nothing.

Offline Storage Table is the full name. Microsoft has also called the same thing an Offline Folders file. Almost nobody uses either. What people do instead is find a large file with an unfamiliar extension, copy it somewhere safe, then discover that nothing will open it. The file is fine. The refusal is deliberate. Understanding why makes the rest of the format straightforward. Unsure whether an OST is even what you have? The format identification table settles it from the first line of the file.

What an OST Is Actually For

Outlook can talk to a server mailbox two ways. Online mode fetches each message as you click it, which needs a connection for everything. Cached Exchange Mode keeps a local copy and works from that, syncing changes back when it can. The OST is that local copy. What it copies from is a mailbox inside an Exchange database on the server, so an OST is a cache of one slice of an EDB.

The point is responsiveness rather than backup. Reading from a file on your own disk is faster than a round trip to a mail server, so Outlook feels quick even on a slow link and keeps working on a train. Everything else about the format follows from being built for that job rather than for storage.

What a Cache Is Built For

  • Speed, by avoiding the network
  • Working while disconnected
  • Being rebuilt from the server at any time
  • Holding a useful subset rather than everything

What a Backup Is Built For

  • Surviving the loss of the original
  • Being readable somewhere else
  • Holding everything, by definition
  • Being verifiable against what it copied
An OST is entirely the left column. Every complaint about the format comes from someone expecting the right column. The two lists share almost nothing.

Why the File Refuses to Move

Copy an OST to a memory stick, carry it to another machine, point Outlook at it. Outlook answers with a message about the file being configured for use with a different mailbox. People read that as corruption. It is not.

An OST records which mailbox it caches. Outlook profiles are MAPI profiles, so each account in one carries an identity for the mailbox behind it. Opening the cache means comparing the two. A cache is only valid for the thing it caches, so a mismatch means the file is meaningless to this profile and Outlook says so rather than attaching a store full of somebody else's mail.

On the original machine

Match
open the OST
read the mailbox it caches
compare to the profile account
same mailbox
attach the store

The cache and the account agree, so Outlook uses the file and syncs from where it left off.

On any other machine

Mismatch
open the OST
read the mailbox it caches
compare to the profile account
different mailbox
refuse

Nothing is damaged. The check simply fails. Outlook then offers to build a fresh cache instead.

The comparison is the entire mechanism. It is also why the answer to a refused OST is never to try harder with Outlook, since Outlook is behaving exactly as designed.

Outlook has no import for OST. The File menu will import a PST all day. It will not import an OST in any version, because an OST is not something the format was ever meant to accept from outside. The route out of one is to read it with software that parses the file directly.

What an OST Does Not Contain

Here is where the cache word earns its keep. An OST holds what Outlook decided to keep locally, which is not the same as what the mailbox holds.

Cached Exchange Mode has a setting called Mail to keep offline. Microsoft documents the desktop default as twelve months, with the slider running from three days at one end to All at the other. Anything outside that window stays on the server and never reaches the file.

So a fifteen gigabyte OST taken from a sixty gigabyte mailbox is not a broken copy. It is a correct cache of the last twelve months, behaving exactly as configured.

Where it livesIn the OST
Mail newer than the sync windowYes
Mail older than the sync windowNo. Server only
Shared and delegated foldersCached by default, switched off under Download Shared Folders
Online archive mailboxNo. Never cached
Server side rulesNo
Public foldersFavourites only, when that option is left on

Check the window before assuming the file is complete. Account settings, double click the account, read the Mail to keep offline slider. Whatever it says is what the OST contains, however large the file looks or however old the account is. On Outlook 2016 and later the same slider governs cached shared folders too. In managed estates the value often comes from Group Policy rather than from the user, so the slider may be set and locked.

The Encryption Myth

A number of pages selling recovery software describe an OST as server side encrypted, giving that as the reason you cannot open one elsewhere. It is wrong on both counts.

An OST is built to the same specification as a PST, down to the same B-tree indexes and the same block layout. It uses the same keyless encoding too, which Microsoft describes in that specification as obfuscation providing no additional security. No key exists. Nothing is decrypted. Software that reads the format reads an OST exactly as it reads a PST.

What the Vendor Pages Claim

  • The file is encrypted by the server
  • A key exists somewhere
  • Outlook decrypts it on open
  • That is why nothing else reads it

What the Specification Says

  • The same keyless encoding a PST uses
  • No key of any kind
  • Obfuscation with no additional security
  • Anything reads it once the encoding is known
The two explanations point at completely different solutions. Only one of them works, which is why the wrong one costs people hours.

The reason Outlook refuses a copied OST is the mailbox check described above, which is a policy decision rather than a cryptographic one. One of those can be worked around by reading the file directly. The other could not be.

What Happens When the Mailbox Goes Away

While the mailbox exists, the OST is disposable. Delete it and Outlook builds another. That reverses completely the moment the account stops existing.

An employee leaves and the mailbox is deprovisioned. A company closes an account. A subscription lapses. From that point the OST on the laptop is not a cache of anything, because the thing it cached is gone. It becomes the only remaining copy of whatever it happened to be holding.

The desktop looks identical either way. A working cache and a cache of a mailbox that no longer exists present the same file, the same size and the same folder tree. Nothing warns you which one you have, which is exactly why OST files get deleted during a clear out at the worst possible moment.

Mailbox still exists

The file is disposable
too large   shorten the window
damaged     delete it, resync
wrong size  ignore it
moving PC   leave it behind
deleted     rebuilds itself

Nothing here can lose you mail, because the server holds the original of everything.

Mailbox is gone

The file is the original
too large   leave it alone
damaged     recover, never repair
wrong size  that is all there is
moving PC   take it with you
deleted     gone permanently

Every instruction reverses. The same actions that were free now destroy the only copy.

Almost every question about an OST resolves once you know which column you are in. Answer that first, because the correct move for one column is the destructive move for the other.

The Size Limit And Why Raising It Is the Wrong Move

An OST carries the same ceiling a PST does, set through the registry and defaulting to fifty gigabytes on any recent Outlook. Hit it and Outlook stops writing to the file.

Virtual desktop estates hit this first, since a profile container has its own ceiling and the OST sits inside it. The usual response is to look up the registry key and raise the number. For a PST that is at least arguable, since a PST is the only copy of what it holds. For an OST it is close to the worst available answer, because the sync window is sitting right there.

Raising the Ceiling

  • Registry edit on every machine that needs it
  • Microsoft does not support the result
  • Large files search slowly and corrupt more
  • The cache keeps growing until you do it again

Shortening the Sync Window

  • One slider in the account settings
  • Fully supported and reversible
  • File shrinks and Outlook speeds up
  • Nothing is lost, since the server still has it all
The left column is what most guides describe. The right column is what the file is actually for. It also costs one click.

All of that assumes the left column above. Shortening the window trims the cache safely because the server still keeps the original. Do the same thing to an OST whose mailbox has already gone and the trimmed mail leaves with it, since there is nothing left to sync it back from.

Whether an OST Can Be Repaired

Search for a damaged OST and the results disagree with each other. Some say the Inbox Repair Tool, scanpst.exe, fixes one. Others say it was never built for the format and will not touch it. Both positions have supporters writing confidently.

The disagreement matters less than it looks, because for a working account the question rarely needs answering. A cache with a problem does not need repairing. It needs deleting, at which point Outlook builds a clean one from the server and the argument becomes academic.

While that rebuild runs, the mail has not gone anywhere. Outlook on the Web shows the same mailbox from the server side, which is worth remembering during the hour a large mailbox takes to download again.

Repair only becomes a real question in the right hand column. With nothing to resync from, the damaged file is the only copy, so a tool that reads the format directly is doing recovery rather than repair. That is a different job from the one the Inbox Repair Tool was written for.

Why New Outlook Has No OST at All

Microsoft has confirmed in its own answers forum that the new Outlook for Windows does not import OST files, because it was built on a different architecture. It talks to the mailbox directly instead of maintaining a local store.

Two things follow from that. Anybody holding an OST today got it from classic Outlook, so the file already belongs to a previous generation of the product. The population of these files is also fixed rather than growing, since the client that produced them is being replaced.

  1. Classic Outlook Cached Exchange Mode Exchange, Microsoft 365 and Outlook.com accounts all get one. So do IMAP accounts, which switched from PST to OST in Outlook 2013.
  2. New Outlook No local store The client talks to the mailbox directly. Microsoft confirms there is no OST import, because there is no OST.
  3. What that leaves A fixed population Every OST in existence was written by a client being replaced. The number can only go down from here.
The format is not being deprecated so much as left behind. Files already on disks stay readable, but nothing new is producing them.

If an old one is sitting on a disk somewhere, that is a reason to open it now rather than later. The tooling that reads these files is not going to improve. The client that created them is on its way out.

What This Means If You Are Holding One

  1. Find out whether the mailbox still exists. Everything depends on this. If it does, the OST is disposable and the mail is safe on the server. If it does not, you are holding the only copy and it needs treating that way.
  2. Check the sync window before trusting the contents. A large file is not a complete file. The account settings tell you how far back Outlook was keeping mail.
  3. Do not expect Outlook to help. No version imports an OST. Time spent on new profiles and repair tools is time spent on the wrong problem.
  4. Read it directly instead. The format is documented, so software outside Outlook can open the file without any profile at all.

An OST that has outlived its mailbox is worth opening sooner rather than later, since nothing about the situation improves with time. The viewers take the file as it is, with no profile and no Outlook involved, which answers the question of what is actually in there. If any of it needs to live somewhere usable afterwards, that is what the converters are for.

Behaviour checked against Microsoft support documentation in August 2026. New Outlook has no OST at all, which Microsoft confirms in its own answers forum.

Questions People Ask

8 questions, answered in full below.

Can I copy an OST file to another computer?

The file copies perfectly well. Outlook on the other machine is what refuses it, because the file records which mailbox it caches and no profile there matches. Copying is never the failure. The check that happens afterwards is.

Is an OST file a backup of my mailbox?

No. Treating one as a backup is the mistake that costs people mail. It is a cache of a server mailbox, so it holds whatever Outlook decided was worth keeping locally rather than everything the account contains. Anything the sync settings excluded was never written to it.

Why does Outlook say the OST is configured for a different mailbox?

Because it is. Outlook has read the record that says so. The message appears when a profile is rebuilt, a machine is replaced, an account is renamed or a roaming profile arrives on a different computer. Outlook is not confused. It is declining to attach a cache belonging to a mailbox it is not connected to.

Is an OST file encrypted?

Not in any meaningful sense, whatever some vendor pages claim. It uses the same keyless encoding a PST uses, which Microsoft describes in the specification as obfuscation offering no additional security. There is no server side key and nothing needs decrypting.

Why is the OST hidden away when the PST is not?

Because one is yours and the other is Outlook working memory. A PST is something you create and are expected to move, so it lands somewhere visible. An OST is disposable scratch space Outlook manages itself, so it goes under AppData where Windows keeps application data and stays out of your way. The placement is a hint about how each file is meant to be treated.

My OST has hit its size limit, should I raise it in the registry?

Almost certainly not. The supported answer for a cache is to shorten the Mail to keep offline window, which shrinks the file in one step and loses nothing, because the server still holds everything outside the window. Raising the ceiling gives you a larger file that searches slowly and is more likely to break.

Does deleting the OST delete my email?

Not if the mailbox still exists and the account still works, since Outlook simply rebuilds the cache from the server. If the mailbox is gone, the OST may be the only copy left, so deleting it is permanent. Those two situations look identical from the desktop, which is why the file gets deleted at exactly the wrong moment.

Does the new Outlook for Windows use OST files?

No. It talks to the mailbox directly rather than keeping a local store, so there is no OST to corrupt, outgrow or repair. Anyone holding an OST today got it from classic Outlook.

Sources

Where the figures and behaviour described above were checked.

  1. Introduction to Outlook Data Files, pst and ost Microsoft Support
  2. MS-PST, Strength of Encoded PST Data Blocks Microsoft Learn, Open Specifications
  3. Plan and configure Cached Exchange Mode in Outlook Microsoft Learn
  4. Only a subset of your Exchange mailbox items is synchronized Microsoft Learn
  5. Configure size limit for PST and OST files in Outlook Microsoft Learn
  6. Why New Outlook does not have an OST import option Microsoft Q and A