Which Email Formats Will Still Open in 20 Years
The people holding DBX files in 2003 had no reason to worry. It was the most common mail format on earth.
Which email formats last is decided by who can still read them, not by the disk. Files do not rot. Formats are abandoned. A mail archive becomes unreadable because the software that understood it stopped existing, not because anything happened to the bytes. That distinction decides which format you should be keeping things in.
The question worth asking is not which format is best today. It is which one will still open when the person asking is somebody you have never met, working on a machine that has not been built yet.
What Ends an Email Format
Three things decide whether a format is still readable in twenty years. None of them is about quality.
-
Is the specification publicThe strongest single signalA published description means somebody can write a reader in future without permission or reverse engineering -
Is it text or binaryText degrades gracefullyA damaged text file loses part of itself. A damaged binary file with an index can lose all of itself -
How many independent readersOne is a risk, twenty is notA format read only by its creator's software depends entirely on that company continuing to care
Age is evidence and it goes undervalued. A format that has already been readable for forty years has survived every technology shift since. One that is ten years old has survived none. Existing history is the only real information anybody has about the future here.
One Email Format That Died in Plain Sight
Doubt that a format can die inside one working career and DBX settles it.
In 2003 it sat on nearly every Windows machine in the world, because Outlook Express came with the operating system. No current mail program reads one. Not Outlook, not Thunderbird, not Apple Mail. The format did not fail and nothing corrupted. Microsoft stopped shipping the program and nobody else had ever implemented it.
1997 ships with Internet Explorer
2001 on most Windows machines
2007 Vista replaces Outlook Express
2009 Windows 7 has no mail client at all
2026 no mainstream program reads one
The people holding DBX files in 2003 had no reason to worry. It was the most common mail format on earth. Ubiquity is not durability. The two get confused constantly when somebody is choosing where to put an archive.
Read next What is a DBX File And Why Nothing Opens One The format this whole argument rests on, in full. Read next PDF/A Is a Standard Made of Refusals The same three tests applied to a format built to outlast things.How Each Email Format Rates for Longevity
Against those three tests, the formats separate more sharply than their popularity suggests.
| Format | Spec | Text | Readers | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | Public, RFC 5322 | Yes | Dozens | Safest available |
| MBOX | Public | Yes | Dozens | Equally safe, one file |
| MHT | Public, RFC 2557 | Yes | Several | Safe, narrowing support |
| PST | Published by Microsoft | No | Several | Reasonable, vendor tied |
| MSG | Published by Microsoft | No | Few | Weaker, needs its parser |
| OLM | Not published | Partly | Few | Poor for the long run |
| DBX | Never published | No | None current | Already gone |
The top two rows are not there because those formats are clever. They are there because a message stored as text under a public specification is the one thing in mail that everything can read.
PST is better than its reputation and worse than the top two. The specification is public and other people's software reads it, which is not the position DBX was ever in. It is still binary and still one company's format. A binary index is also a single point of failure that a text file does not have.
The Email Format That Is Not a Format
Archiving mail as PDF comes up constantly and it answers a different question than the one being asked.
What a PDF Keeps
- The message as it appeared on screen
- A page anybody can open
- Something printable and stable
- A form courts often accept
What It Loses
- The headers and the routing
- Attachments as files rather than names
- Threading and folder structure
- Any ability to search it as mail
As well, never instead. Keep the message in a message format and generate a PDF where somebody needs a page. Doing it the other way round throws away everything the headers carry. Those are what answers most questions asked years later.
Read next What a Conversion Loses And Why It Is Not a Fault What the move to a lasting format costs you. What it does not. Read next A PDF Does Not Contain Text And That Explains Everything Why a printed copy loses more than the attachments. What it keeps instead.What Actually Goes Wrong to Email Archives
Format choice is one risk and not the commonest one.
| What happens | How often |
|---|---|
| Nobody can find it | Constantly |
| The drive it was on failed | Often |
| Nobody remembers the password | Often |
| It was never actually complete | Often |
| The format cannot be read | Rarely, only after decades |
Four of the five are about handling rather than about formats. Choosing well matters and it comes fifth, behind knowing where the file is and having more than one copy.
An archive nobody has opened is a claim rather than a fact. Once a year, open one, search it and find something specific. That habit catches four of the five rows above while they are still fixable.
Read next How Long to Keep Mail And Who Decides How long any of it should be kept, which comes before choosing a format.Choosing a Format for an Archive You Will Not Maintain
- Keep the message, not a rendering. EML for individual messages, MBOX for folders. Everything else is a copy of a copy.
- Do not encrypt an archive with a password one person knows. Whoever opens it in ten years is not that person. Disk encryption with managed keys is a different thing and it is fine.
- Write down what it is. A plain text file beside the archive saying what it holds, where it came from and when. Nothing else in the folder explains itself.
- Keep the original alongside any conversion. Converting is safe when the source survives. Converting in place is a decision that cannot be revisited.
- Open it once a year. Not check that it exists. Open it, search it, find one message. Anything less proves nothing.
The last one is the whole discipline. Every other item on this list is a decision made once. That one is a habit. It is also the only item that finds problems rather than preventing them.
Where an old archive is in a format nobody supports any more, reading it is the first step and converting it is the second. Our file viewers open several of these in a browser tab, so you can see what is there before deciding. The converters move the contents into something that will still open in twenty years.
Format status and specification availability checked against the Library of Congress format registry and the referenced articles in August 2026.
Questions People Ask
7 questions, answered in full below.Which mail format lasts longest?
The plain message, stored as EML or MBOX. Both are readable text following a specification that has not changed in decades. Dozens of independent programs read them. Nothing else in mail comes close on any of those three counts.
Is PST a bad choice for an archive?
Not bad. Not the safest either. Microsoft published the specification and independent software reads it, so it is not a closed box. It is still a binary format tied to one company, which is a different bet from a text format nobody owns.
Do files decay on their own?
Storage fails. That is a copying problem rather than a format problem. What actually kills a format is the software going away. The bytes on a working disk are as good as the day they were written.
Should I archive email as PDF?
As well, sometimes. Never instead. A PDF keeps how the message looked and loses the headers, the attachments as files and the ability to search the way mail is searched. Keep the message and produce a page when somebody needs one.
How often should an archive be checked?
Often enough to notice a problem while it is still fixable. Once a year is a reasonable habit. Open something, search it, confirm it reads. A file nobody has opened in a decade is a file nobody knows about.
What happened to DBX files?
Outlook Express stopped shipping with Windows and nothing that came afterwards read the format. It was on most Windows machines in 2003 and no current mail program opens one. That took about twenty years.
Does converting an old archive risk it?
Only if you convert in place. Keep the original untouched and work on a copy. Then the worst case is a wasted afternoon. The real risk is leaving it in a format that stops being readable while you decide.
Sources
Where the figures and behaviour described above were checked.
- Digital preservation Wikipedia
- Sustainability of Digital Formats Library of Congress
- Open format Wikipedia